Blind Content-Adaptive Multi-Image Steganography Using Canonical Sparse Multi-Transform Residual Maps and AES-GCM

Main Article Content

Taif Alobaidi

Abstract

Context: Multi-image LSB steganography can reduce payload per cover image, but conventional content-agnostic allocation and non-blind extraction limit practical use and do not adequately address modern steganalysis. Objective: This work develops a blind, lossless-delivery multi-image steganography method that uses canonical sparse multi-transform residual maps to determine payload allocation and embedding locations. Method: Each cover is converted to an LSB-normalized canonical image, (C_i=I_i\ \mathrm{AND}\ 254), which remains invariant after one-LSB substitution and enables the receiver to reconstruct the DWT/DCT residual maps, residual-energy allocation, and keyed embedding schedule from the received stego images alone. AES-256-GCM provides authenticated encryption, while a collision-free keyed bootstrap header conveys the required protocol information and a fresh 96-bit nonce. Experiments used a publicly available 9,000-image, (256\times256) grayscale BOSS-derived collection, arranged as 4,500 two-image transmissions and split at group level into 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% test groups. Results: At requested rates of 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 bpp, all 36,000 group-method-rate executions achieved canonical equality, successful AES-GCM authentication, exact plaintext recovery, and zero observed sealed-payload BER. At 0.05 bpp, CSR-LSB achieved (64.49\pm1.87) dB PSNR and (0.999888\pm0.000105) SSIM on 900 held-out test images. It reduced compact residual-feature detector AUC from 0.9978 to 0.8514 and deep residual CNN AUC from 0.9957 to 0.9366 relative to uniform keyed LSB. Conclusions: CSR-LSB provides blind authenticated recovery and lower detectability than uniform keyed LSB, although modern detectors still identify its stego images reliably; future work should incorporate distortion-minimizing embedding to improve resistance to advanced steganalysis.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
T. Alobaidi, “Blind Content-Adaptive Multi-Image Steganography Using Canonical Sparse Multi-Transform Residual Maps and AES-GCM”, Systems and Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.64409/sycom.v2.i2.64.

References

[1] M. Hussain, A. W. A. Wahab, Y. I. B. Idris, A. T. S. Ho, and K.-H. Jung, “Image steganography in spatial domain: A survey,” Signal Process.: Image Commun., vol. 65, pp. 46–66, May 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2018.03.012.

[2] J. Fridrich, M. Goljan, and R. Du, “Reliable detection of LSB steganography in color and grayscale images,” in Proc. ACM Workshop Multimedia Security: New Challenges, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2001, pp. 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1232454.1232466.

[3] R. Apau, M. Asante, F. Twum, J. Ben Hayfron-Acquah, and K. O. Peasah, “Image steganography techniques for resisting statistical steganalysis attacks: A systematic literature review,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 9, Art. no. e0308807, Sep. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308807.

[4] N. J. De La Croix, T. Ahmad, and F. Han, “Comprehensive survey on image steganalysis using deep learning,” Array, vol. 22, Art. no. 100353, Jul. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2024.100353.

[5] Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, Apr. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.

[6] O. F. Rashid, S. A. Tuama, and H. Al-Shahwani, “A multi-image codebook approach for secure text transmission,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 12, Art. no. e0338836, Dec. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338836.

[7] V. Holub, J. Fridrich, and T. Denemark, “Universal distortion function for steganography in an arbitrary domain,” EURASIP J. Inf. Security, vol. 2014, Art. no. 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-417X-2014-1.

[8] T. Alobaidi and W. B. Mikhael, “Mixed nonorthogonal transforms representation for face recognition,” Circuits Syst. Signal Process., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1684–1694, Apr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-018-0931-4.

[9] K. Hu, M. Wang, X. Ma, J. Chen, X. Wang, and X. Wang, “Learning-based image steganography and watermarking: A survey,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 249, Art. no. 123715, Sep. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123715.

[10] B. Ma, K. Li, J. Xu, C. Wang, J. Li, and L. Zhang, “Enhancing the security of image steganography via multiple adversarial networks and channel attention modules,” Digit. Signal Process., vol. 141, Art. no. 104121, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2023.104121.

[11] D. Huang, W. Luo, M. Liu, W. Tang, and J. Huang, “Steganography embedding cost learning with generative multi-adversarial network,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 19, pp. 15–29, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2023.3318939.

[12] W. Li, S. Wu, B. Li, W. Tang, and X. Zhang, “Payload-independent direct cost learning for image steganography,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1970–1975, Mar. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2023.3294291.

[13] J. Fridrich and J. Kodovský, “Rich models for steganalysis of digital images,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 868–882, Jun. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2012.2190402.

[14] J. Kodovský, J. Fridrich, and V. Holub, “Ensemble classifiers for steganalysis of digital media,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 432–444, Apr. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2011.2175919.

[15] M. Boroumand, M. Chen, and J. Fridrich, “Deep residual network for steganalysis of digital images,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1181–1193, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2018.2871749.

[16] L. Bohang, N. Li, J. Yang, O. Alfarraj, F. Albelhai, A. Tolba, et al., “Image steganalysis using active learning and hyperparameter optimization,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, Art. no. 7340, Mar. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92082-w.

[17] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), FIPS PUB 197, Update 1. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: NIST, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.197-upd1.

[18] M. Dworkin, “Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC”, NIST Special Publication 800-38D. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: NIST, Nov. 2007. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-38D.

[19] P. Bas, T. Filler, and T. Pevný, “Break Our Steganographic System: The ins and outs of organizing BOSS,” in Information Hiding, 13th Int. Conf., IH 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6958, T. Filler, T. Pevný, A. D. Ker, and S. Craver, Eds. Prague, Czech Republic: Springer, 2011, pp. 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24178-9_5.

[20] Y. Huang, Z. Liu, Q. Wu, and X. Liu, “Robust image steganography against JPEG compression based on DCT residual modulation,” Signal Process., vol. 219, Art. no. 109431, Jun. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2024.109431.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.